PDA

View Full Version : July 26, 2007: Death penalty pondered



Record-Journal
07-25-2007, 09:06 PM
Death penalty pondere
By Elisabeth Strillacci, Record-Journal staff
CHESHIRE — Now that the state medical examiner has deemed the deaths of a Cheshire woman and her two daughters homicides, what additional charges will it bring against the two suspects arrested?

That decision will “take a little time,” New Haven State’s Attorney Michael Dearington said Wednesday.

Joshua Komisarjevsky of Cheshire and Steven Hayes of Winsted already face numerous charges, including kidnapping, aggravated sexual assault and burglary, in Monday’s deadly home invasion.

The two men are accused of breaking into the home of Dr. William Petit Jr., a prominent endocrinologist, and his family, assaulting the doctor, forcing his wife Jennifer Hawke-Petit to withdraw money from the bank, sexually assaulting at least one of the three females in the household, then setting fire to the home before fleeing.

Neither Cheshire nor state police have speculated publicly on a motive for the crime or why the Petit family may have been targeted, but they have made it clear that additional charges will be filed.

The medical examiner determined that Hawke-Petit died from strangulation and the couple’s two daughters, Hayley, 17, and Michaela, 11, died from smoke inhalation. Dr. Petit is hospitalized.

State statute defines capital felony murder in part as: “Murder committed in the course of the commission of sexual assault in the first degree; murder of two or more persons at the same time or in the course of a single transaction; or murder of a person under sixteen years of age.”

If the men are charged with capital felony murder, they could face the death penalty. In order to consider putting someone to death, at least one aggravating factor must be met in the case, including “the defendant committed the offense during the commission of or attempted commission of, or during the immediate flight from the commission or attempted commission of a felony, and he had previously been convicted of the same felony.”

Both Komisarjevsky and Hayes have been convicted, respectively, of second-degree burglary and third-degree burglary prior to the Cheshire crime, and both of those are felonies. They were charged with burglary in the most recent Cheshire homicide, as well, meaning they technically qualify for the death penalty if they are charged with capital felony.

“We have to look at all the evidence, including the autopsy, and then look at the state statutes,” Dearington said. “It may seem like a simple case, and from some e-mails I’ve gotten, like one from a man in Texas who said these guys would already be dead, I know people may not understand why we’re taking the time with this. But we need to determine the conduct of each individual as best we can. There are two defendants in the case, and that may have an impact on the charges.”

William Dow, a New Haven criminal defense attorney, said that if the men are charged with capital felonies, “the first thing any good defense lawyer is going to do is review all the facts that the state has in the case, because usually if it’s a capital case, then it’s pretty strong.”

He said that part of planning the defense also will be determining mitigating factors, “things in the person’s life that may have led to their becoming the person they are, the person that has acted this way.”

That could include not only testimony from expert witnesses such as psychologists or psychiatrists, but “character witnesses who know the person and the things that have happened in their life. You want to present the jury with a reason for why things have happened.”

Dow is not involved in the Petit case.

He added that when misinformation or too much information is printed in media reports, it makes it more difficult to find a jury that is unaffected.

“But you’re also talking about a case that is two-and-a-half to three years from coming to trial, and in that time a lot of people will move to Connecticut who’ve never heard about the case. So, it’s certainly not impossible” to get an impartial jury, Dow said.

Each man also will be entitled to his own attorney, said Dow, “someone who is completely dedicated to that individual.”

As of Tuesday, both men were represented by public defenders. It was not clear if they would hire private attorneys.

estrillacci@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2225

rapuda
07-25-2007, 11:45 PM
I can't speak for whoever the jurors will be, but if I was a juror, those men would be EXECUTED. They kidnapped, raped, and murdered. They deserve death. I don't care how they were raised, or if they had a bad life. I don't care if they were abused or mistreated in thier lives. They need to die.

KleineP
07-26-2007, 12:52 AM
I always thought that I was unsupportive of the death penalty. I just couldn't reconcile myself with deciding that it was okay to take someone's life as a punishment for having taken life. For me, I always thought that was like trying to teach your kids not to hit by hitting them.

But in following this case I feel nothing but absolute repugnance for these men and I find myself thinking that they don't deserve to live.

I don't know who I am to delve out "deserve" - I am nobody. Still, I can't help feeling that these men have given up their right to be part of this world.

Eastside Bill
07-26-2007, 07:20 AM
I am against the death penalty. The state should never be in the position of putting its citizens to death, no matter how deserving the individual may be. History has shown that mistakes can be made and the wrong person convicted, incarcerated and even put to death. That being said, were there ever a situation that would make me change my mind, this is it. Those two men are monsters, plain and simple. May they never live a day in freedom again. What they did to that family and what they have done to this community is too evil to comprehend.

Allan
07-26-2007, 11:18 AM
Regarding the death penalty, granting that the crime committed was unusually heinous, is it worth comparing that with the 10 to 15 years it will take to bring the pair to an actual execution date and the taxpayer cash spent prosecuting and defending them?

FJT
07-26-2007, 03:11 PM
This is CT and although we have the death penalty it will either not be used or it will take decades to implement.

Frank




Death penalty pondere
By Elisabeth Strillacci, Record-Journal staff
CHESHIRE — Now that the state medical examiner has deemed the deaths of a Cheshire woman and her two daughters homicides, what additional charges will it bring against the two suspects arrested?

That decision will “take a little time,” New Haven State’s Attorney Michael Dearington said Wednesday.

Joshua Komisarjevsky of Cheshire and Steven Hayes of Winsted already face numerous charges, including kidnapping, aggravated sexual assault and burglary, in Monday’s deadly home invasion.

The two men are accused of breaking into the home of Dr. William Petit Jr., a prominent endocrinologist, and his family, assaulting the doctor, forcing his wife Jennifer Hawke-Petit to withdraw money from the bank, sexually assaulting at least one of the three females in the household, then setting fire to the home before fleeing.

Neither Cheshire nor state police have speculated publicly on a motive for the crime or why the Petit family may have been targeted, but they have made it clear that additional charges will be filed.

The medical examiner determined that Hawke-Petit died from strangulation and the couple’s two daughters, Hayley, 17, and Michaela, 11, died from smoke inhalation. Dr. Petit is hospitalized.

State statute defines capital felony murder in part as: “Murder committed in the course of the commission of sexual assault in the first degree; murder of two or more persons at the same time or in the course of a single transaction; or murder of a person under sixteen years of age.”

If the men are charged with capital felony murder, they could face the death penalty. In order to consider putting someone to death, at least one aggravating factor must be met in the case, including “the defendant committed the offense during the commission of or attempted commission of, or during the immediate flight from the commission or attempted commission of a felony, and he had previously been convicted of the same felony.”

Both Komisarjevsky and Hayes have been convicted, respectively, of second-degree burglary and third-degree burglary prior to the Cheshire crime, and both of those are felonies. They were charged with burglary in the most recent Cheshire homicide, as well, meaning they technically qualify for the death penalty if they are charged with capital felony.

“We have to look at all the evidence, including the autopsy, and then look at the state statutes,” Dearington said. “It may seem like a simple case, and from some e-mails I’ve gotten, like one from a man in Texas who said these guys would already be dead, I know people may not understand why we’re taking the time with this. But we need to determine the conduct of each individual as best we can. There are two defendants in the case, and that may have an impact on the charges.”

William Dow, a New Haven criminal defense attorney, said that if the men are charged with capital felonies, “the first thing any good defense lawyer is going to do is review all the facts that the state has in the case, because usually if it’s a capital case, then it’s pretty strong.”

He said that part of planning the defense also will be determining mitigating factors, “things in the person’s life that may have led to their becoming the person they are, the person that has acted this way.”

That could include not only testimony from expert witnesses such as psychologists or psychiatrists, but “character witnesses who know the person and the things that have happened in their life. You want to present the jury with a reason for why things have happened.”

Dow is not involved in the Petit case.

He added that when misinformation or too much information is printed in media reports, it makes it more difficult to find a jury that is unaffected.

“But you’re also talking about a case that is two-and-a-half to three years from coming to trial, and in that time a lot of people will move to Connecticut who’ve never heard about the case. So, it’s certainly not impossible” to get an impartial jury, Dow said.

Each man also will be entitled to his own attorney, said Dow, “someone who is completely dedicated to that individual.”

As of Tuesday, both men were represented by public defenders. It was not clear if they would hire private attorneys.

estrillacci@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2225

BillCarson436
07-26-2007, 05:18 PM
As evil as what happened to that family in Cheshire I take the lone
position that it's part of life... an sickening sad fact of life and it's not
limited to a family in Cheshire.

Be it " God's Will..." or wrong place wrong time... people are killed, raped
and murdered every single day.

The out cry to kill the two people responsible is expected... in this case.


When a family in Iraq is TARGETED... the young daughter raped and family
murdered by an American soldiers ( Not the norm... just making a point )
we see just the opposite. Granted... it's war... their the " enemy "... the
family is not American... but there has NEVER been a single word or cry
for the execution of the guilty party...only a clear message of it's NOT
their fault... they were only doing their jobs... they are" good boys "

To sum this up, the out cry for vengence has a tinge of hyprocracy from
the public... and just once.... I'd like to see it expresses towards the
THOUSANDS of innocent civilians that we are killing on a daily basis
justified by patriotism and the can- do- no - wrong mentality of the
people who can't and won't admit that murder is murder..be it convicts
or soldiers.

OK... that's my opinion.... not shared by anybody else but me.

As a Christian... one that believes in God.... I have faith that HE will
decide their punishment... and he will administer it ... and those who
feel the need to have them killed as an act of vengence need to think
of how it will effect their final judgement.

collie
07-26-2007, 07:47 PM
I oppose the death penalty, period. Why stoop to a murderer's level unless you are a murderer, yourself. Life imprisonment would be more of a punishment anyways.