PDA

View Full Version : Glen Richter's Sunday column



flatrat
10-05-2008, 01:21 PM
10/05/2008
I like Obama, but ...

I like Barack Obama. And on some level I'd like to think he's the one candidate who might be able to bridge the racial gap in this country to some extent. And a lot of us don't "cling to guns or religion" and would be fine with a president who doesn't look like the guys on the dollar bills.
But then I remember how very far to the left he is, and how well that's been concealed. And that's when I conclude he's not the one.
* * *
Now, about Bill Ayers ...
That would be Bill Ayers of the bomb-planting Weather Underground of three or four decades ago ... Bill "no regrets" Ayers ("I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough" is how he was quoted in The New York Times on Sept. 11, 2001) or ... Bill "Kill all the rich people ... bring the Revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at" Ayers. Anyway, he's now a "distinguished professor of education" in Chicago and is married to his fellow terrorist Bernadine Dohrn (whose most famous quote is what she said in 1969 about what the Manson clan had done to Sharon Tate and friends: "Dig it - first they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them. They even shoved a fork into a victim's stomach. Wild!")
Dig it - that Bill Ayers. I bring him up not just because of his close and longstanding relationship with Mr. Obama, but because of Mr. Obama's attempt to pass him off, during one of the primary debates, as just somebody from the neighborhood he may run into once in a while. Not only did he serve on several boards with Ayers, for several years, but he also launched his political career in the Ayers-Dohrn living room in 1995.
Just somebody from the neighborhood, indeed. How cagey can you get? So how are we supposed to believe in the new, relatively moderate Barack Obama we've been seeing since the primary race ended?
* * *
And then there's the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whom I bring up not because Mr. Obama had a close and long-term relationship with a guy who preached "God damn America!" but because he had a close and long-term relationship with a guy who preached that the U.S. government invented the AIDS virus in order to kill black people. How destructive is that?
* * *
And then there's the missus. I understand that we're not voting for first lady, but we will get one, whichever way we vote.
And I'm afraid I'd rather not see a first lady who was proud of her country "for the first time in my adult lifetime" only a few months ago.
And I'm afraid I'd rather not see a first lady who told an audience at a rally, just last March, that America is a "downright mean" country.
And I'm afraid I'd rather not see a first lady who tells inner-city kids, "Don't go into corporate America. Work for the community. Be social workers." That may be fine when your husband's a senator and you pull in $317,000 a year working for a big hospital, but what kind of future are those kids going to have, working "for the community?"
Yes, I saw her convention speech - heck, they practically had her baking cookies on stage - but there still wasn't enough sweetness and light and smiling and waving to conceal her anger or her elitism.
* * *
And yet, I like Barack Obama. And on some level I'd like to think he's the one candidate right now, and the only candidate we're likely to see anytime soon, who might be able to bridge the racial gap in this country to some extent. And a lot of us would be proud to see a president who doesn't look like the guys on the dollar bills. And I think he'd be amazed at how many people in this country don't "get bitter," don't "cling to guns or religion" and would be happy to vote for "people who don't look like them."
I know Oprah says he's the one, but I'm afraid - with all that baggage - I can't agree.
Reach Glenn Richter at grichter@record-journal.com or (203) 317-2222

Oh, Glen....you're slinging mud again...


On The McCain camps deperate attempt to link Obama with Ayers, lacking a coherent plan to deal with the economy and considering McCain's ties to Phil Gramm.

Is Bill Ayers the Republican's Kevin Bacon?

Obama's "real" connection with Ayers is explained here:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/obamas_weatherman_connection.html

The only hard facts that have come out so far are the $200 contribution by Ayers to the Obama re-election fund, and their joint membership of the eight-person Woods Fund Board. Ayers did not respond to e-mails and telephone calls requesting clarification of the relationship. Obama spokesman Bill Burton noted in a statement that Ayers was a professor of education at the University of Illinois and a former aide to Mayor Richard M. Daley, and continued:

Senator Obama strongly condemns the violent actions of the Weathermen group, as he does all acts of violence. But he was an eight-year-old child when Ayers and the Weathermen were active, and any attempt to connect Obama with events of almost forty years ago is ridiculous.

On Obama's connection to Rev Wright:
Obama distanced himself from Wright months ago. Its old news. Who's going to best fix the economy, assuming its fixable? That's new news. I agree, Glen, lets keep religion out of politics.

Hey Glen,
How about Gov Palin's involvement in an extreme fundamental church and her ties to the anti witchcraft pastor from Kenya? She believes humans co-existed with dinosaurs and supports the teaching of creationism along with science in our public schools. Lets not pull the "Reverend" card. Neither side wins.

How about Palin's ties to the extremist Alaska Independence party, and her husband's (the "first dude") membership in that secessionist organization? I laugh when Palin tries to call Obama unpatriotic, when they supported Alaska's secession from the United States. How patriotic is that? And she thinks Obama should be disqualified from running?

On first wives, how about Cindy McCain's stealing money from charity to support her drug habit? How about John McCain's abandonment of his "first" wife because she was damaged from a car accident? And whats wrong Michelle Obama telling kids to be a community organizer? Its certainly a more honest and honorable profession that being a Wall St CEO.

I like Glen Richter. he sometimes writes some good columns. On some level I think he might be a good columnist. But I dont know, he has all this Republican talking point "baggage."

rapuda
10-06-2008, 01:01 AM
WOW! That was a great read. Thanks flatrat.

alwaysright
10-06-2008, 07:08 AM
On first wives, how about Cindy McCain's stealing money from charity to support her drug habit? How about John McCain's abandonment of his "first" wife because she was damaged from a car accident? And whats wrong Michelle Obama telling kids to be a community organizer? Its certainly a more honest and honorable profession that being a Wall St CEO.

so, they say they've been re-habed. Off the dope- but rush, little george and McCaged's wife, that tarted up rich girl, are all damaged by their involvement in drugs. Coke, oxy's, percocets and religion. All the same for these republican liars. not to forget little george is a so called reformed alchoholic- and they all say that lasts for life. Glen is a mediocre writer- seldom does his stuff have ANY influence on the reader. He's sent letters out to smear people and the letters have been by and large ignored. When someone supports someone like McCaged- you have to wonder if they've researched the issues that might apply to THEM. LIke how does the republican party fall on things like education... or maybe even gay marraige? think it over before you write that McCaged is the one to vote for-

flatrat
10-06-2008, 11:55 AM
And if you want a "No Spin" look at John McCain dont miss this month's Rolling stone article:

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain

CMNSNC
10-06-2008, 01:27 PM
Are you afraid of the truth?
It seems that both the Repiblican and Democratic parties are afraid. Very afraid!
There are three candidates running for president in '08. Why is the third candidate excluded? For a very good reason.
Could it be that he would answer the really tough questions honestly?
I watched the 'debates' and yet found no real debating going on. Just a magic act throwing the blame on anyone but their own parties!
As long as the R&D parties are excluding other candidates, I would suggest you look at this.
"www.votenader.org"
Do your yourself a favor and find out what someone who has the real interests of this country has to say.
Watch all the videos and interviews and then decide.
Ralph Nader really seems to have the interests of the American people at heart and not the American corporations.
You and I should decide come election day....not Big Money!
Send this to all your friends and enemies as well.
We are not as stupid as the media would have us believe.
Do your own thinking for a change!
Tell Washington to go to hell and let us do the thinking for a change!
If you don't vote....don't complain!

brunet
10-06-2008, 02:42 PM
Democrats should have chosen Clinton, at least you know what you've got.

alwaysright
10-06-2008, 02:53 PM
when you ran, people did know- thus, your loss

collie
10-06-2008, 08:31 PM
I'm voting for Nadar and I'll vote for Brunet too!

alwaysright
10-07-2008, 04:13 PM
because usually you are all over ther minority causes.

collie
10-07-2008, 06:56 PM
Obama lost my vote when he:
1. Denounced his support of reparations
2. Denounced Reverend Wright
3. Voted in favor of FISA

Brunet has always impressed me as a decent and honest man. What more could one ask for in the hotbed of Meriden politics?

Simply because I support civil rights issues doesn't mean I'm another idiot who sold their soul to the Democrats. They haven't earned my respect - I never affiliated with a party in the 34 years I've been voting.

rapuda
10-07-2008, 09:22 PM
Just curious Collie.
Why do you support reparations, and
why shouldn't Obama denounce Wright for the hateful things he said?

collie
10-08-2008, 08:09 PM
I don't write as much as I used to on the forum (thought it got too nasty) and I don't really want to get into a dissertation arguing my beliefs, but I support reparations because of the reality of American history and I also agreed with much of Rev. Wright's opinions.

I would have been an Obama voter frankly. Black churches in America have been and still are cradles of the civil rights movement. For Obama to pretend he had no inkling of Wright's feelings on the subject of race in the USA was laughable. Anyone who has spent any time in a black church has heard similar feelings, at NAACP or civil rights, black history gatherings, the state of the black union, etc...

Obama proved to be a "game" player. Nadar at least has been consistent and not two faced, a hypocrite.

Hopefully, that's enough said.

S_Meriden60
10-09-2008, 08:51 AM
It's that kind of warped thinking that will keep the country divided.
Just what we need. :(

flatrat
10-10-2008, 11:33 AM
It's that kind of warped thinking that will keep the country divided.
Just what we need. :(

Sigh...what we need is leadership. Someone who will rationally approach the pressing issues of the day, as the economy tanks deeper and deeper into recession. Someone who will devote the best resources available to solve this crisis.

Not someone who repeatedly screams "Bill Ayers! Bill Ayers!" while this is taking place, someone who screams "Barack HUSSEIN Obama!" Someone who tries to whip his base (the low information voter) into a hate filled mob frenzy.

Talk about lack of leadership...The worst crisis in our lifetime and all he can do is throw mud. A pathetic response from an angry, out of touch, little old man..McCain's response to the economic crisis can only be described as bizarre.

We do need to come together to meet this challenge. This is no time for divisiveness and petty name calling. Democrats, Republicans, and Independents are all suffering.

rapuda
10-10-2008, 04:57 PM
I agree we need to come together, but I don't believe it's possible for some.
I'm sure I'll get flak for this comment, but the hard right has no intentions of following anyone that isn't a republican, never mind the first black president. Those people that are slinging mud at Obama now will be the same people that will blame him for everything that goes wrong in the future but won't give credit when it's warranted. They'll also conveniently forget Obama inherited a HUGE mess from a republican president who had a republican controlled congress for 6 out of 8 years of his presidency.

Maybe McCain is creating anger at his rallies to get someone to commit an assassination attempt against Obama. His campaign is done. All he has now for options are dirty tactics. I wouldn't be surprised if a few days before the election the McCain campaign drops a bomb on the Obama campaign. It'll most likely be some kind of accusation that can't be proven but will sway voters. Also, a terrorist attack before the elections will scare people away from Obama because according to McCain Obama is too inexperienced.