PDA

View Full Version : Letter of the week, 2/4/08: Smokestacks or nature?



David
02-04-2008, 05:41 PM
More smokestacks?
Editor:

No amount of tax revenue can justify the short-sighted destruction of our natural spaces. I am referring to the players who want to construct another power plant within earshot of a partially completed one, and, to make matters worse, they want to build it on pristine land.

The existing railroad tracks effectually divide a developed area to the east and a relatively pristine area to the west. To the west lie Beaver Pond, “Little Silver Lake,” various wetlands, and approximately 360 acres of Meriden-owned land (NRG). Approximately 50 acres that directly abut the proposed site have been set aside as recreational lands with permanent deed restrictions. This requires that the land be kept in a natural state.

The proposed site compliments this parcel by supporting a large array of wetlands and wildlife. One only needs to walk there once to realize that it’s worth a million dollars to leave it alone. The state (along with other municipalities) embraces the opportunity to preserve such parcels which abut other open space lands in an attempt to create larger “greenways” and wildlife corridors.

The ideal solution would be for Arena Capital to broker a deal with NRG to utilize the existing unfinished power plant on Cathole Mountain. Next step would be to consider other developed/industrialized areas that would be conducive to this type of development.

To develop this parcel would not only be detrimental to the abutting pond and wetlands, but would essentially fragment the now-existing wildlife/greenway corridor and would create a negative aesthetic impact.

One of the draws of parks and open space areas is their naturalness. To enjoy the Beaver Lake recreation area would mean to enjoy looking at an industrialized complex complete with smokestack(s) and a tangle of power lines.
BOB PAGINI, MERIDEN

collie
02-04-2008, 07:39 PM
I really enjoyed this letter. Too bad the present conservation commission is taking this without a peep of environmental concern. Like the ethics commission, I guess the powers that be have stacked the deck so that "troublemakers" will cause no dissension.

madundertaker
02-06-2008, 10:26 AM
I've lived here in Meriden for 41 years, also my age. I can remember how this town used to be. Now, in my opinion, we are overcrowded and soon we will b come like Bridgeport and Hartford. There will be no more open space for us and our children to enjoy. I live off of Paddock Ave, so I know just how crowded we are. Did we really need another drug store (Wallgreen's) on an allready busy corner? I hear now Wendy's will be closing just so that CVS can expand and out do Wallgreen's. Downtown is nothing but a ghost town. I feel bad for buisnesses who are trying to open up down there but fail only after a few months. No one wants to go there, especially at night. We have an unused NRG plant that needs to be taken over by a company and get it online. We do not need to build another one! What happened to our once beautiful town? I firmly believe there is no hope.

eds
02-06-2008, 01:31 PM
Just think what will happen when we all drive electric cars to save the environment. They will have to build more eyesore power plants ruining the environment. Ironic, isn't it?

Eastside Bill
02-09-2008, 03:52 PM
Just think what will happen when we all drive electric cars to save the environment. They will have to build more eyesore power plants ruining the environment. Ironic, isn't it?

I think you missed the point of Pagini's letter. We already have ruined a site for a power plant that has not come to fruition and sits unused. Why look for another site for yet another plant? Use existing sites that have already been developed in town and redevelopment them. Don't tear up more of our disappearing open spaces

eds
02-11-2008, 07:40 AM
Even if you use the existing power plant space, still more will need to be built. It's only a matter of time.

Eastside Bill
02-11-2008, 07:17 PM
Even if you use the existing power plant space, still more will need to be built. It's only a matter of time.

Sorry, I'm not getting what your point is.

eds
02-12-2008, 08:11 AM
What I am saying is that it will not be a choice of where to build just one plant, but that we will eventually need more power plants to keep up with energy demands for all those electric cars that we are supposed to be driving to rid ourselves of our so-called foreign petroleum addiction. Sure we have ethanol, hydrogen, hybrids, and other technologies, but of those technologies, one single type will not suffice to replace petroleum. We will need a combination of electricity, alternative fuels, and other alternative energy sources. Because electricity will be a significant part of those efforts, those additional power plants will have to go somewhere. The existing location will already have a power plant on it, so where will the additional power plants go? New sites. Trying to preserve open space is futile. Build two plants and then we will have enough capacity for the future.

It is inevitable as we switch to alternative energy that electricity will play a bigger role to that end. How will we keep up with demand for power? We already have significant shortfalls during the summer months and are required to cut back during that time to avoid brown outs. Every summer its the same thing. Turn off A/Cs to conserve power. We need more than just one power plant.

We cannot both maintain open space and nature while maintaining humanity's need for energy. Something has to give. We can cut back only so much, eh?

collie
02-12-2008, 11:10 AM
It makes sense to start with the site already "prepped" to be a power plant. Perhaps they could use old landfills for additional sites, like the old South Meriden dump, when the time comes.

eds
02-12-2008, 05:40 PM
I agree. Start with the site already prepped. I am just commenting on the inevitable.

Happy
02-12-2008, 06:38 PM
I also think it would be best to use the NRG site and keep as much open space as possible. As a society in general, we have to learn to reduce and recycle. We have become spoiled. Hopefully, there will be more efficient and less damaging sources of energy in the future. We need to experience more shortages to appreciate what we have. With the gas shortages in the 70s, we did make an effort to respect the environment. I remember the first Earth Day!