PDA

View Full Version : Nov. 23, 2007: Theater group at odds with developer



Record-Journal
11-22-2007, 11:44 PM
MERIDEN — The feud’s getting nasty and now the court’s involved.

More than one year after the City Council approved the sale of 57-65 W. Main St. and 55 Grove St. to Ross Gulino, a local developer, he and the Castle Craig Players are still at odds.

As a condition of the sale, Gulino and the theater company were required to negotiate a long-term lease that would allow the players to keep their performance space at 57-59 W. Main St. rent free.

The two sides agreed on lease terms earlier this year, but Gulino hasn’t signed the document because of an ongoing feud over the adjacent “red room,” a storefront at 61 W. Main St. the theater has been using as a reception area.

Gulino found a tenant who wanted to occupy the space Sept. 1, but the theater group hasn’t moved out yet and says it needs until the end of the year.

That’s not quick enough for Gulino, who is now suing to evict the players from both the red room and the theater space.

“It’s one stall tactic after another, and I’m fed up,” said Gulino, who bought the properties from the city for $50,000 on the condition that he renovate the buildings and create 12 artist lofts above the West Main Street storefronts. Warren Stephan, players’ president and founder “is not showing me any good faith that he wants to remain in relationship with me. I’ve been patient. What else can I do?”

Stephan could not be reached for comment.

Gulino’s attorney, Dennis Ceneviva, filed the eviction suit in Meriden Superior Court Nov. 15 after sending the players an order to leave the building Oct. 18.

But Michael Del Sole, Stephan’s son-in-law and the players’ attorney, said Gulino’s the one who’s being difficult.
“If he was acting in good faith, why (is) he trying to evict us from the theater?” Del Sole asked.

Del Sole said Gulino sent a letter Sept. 14 demanding the players vacate the red room by the following Monday.

Just two weeks earlier, Del Sole said he and Gulino were still discussing the possibility of the group leasing the space.

“Up until that point, there was no indication there was another tenant,” Del Sole said. If the group had known, “we would have begun to do now what we’re doing, which is to make alternative plans.”

The players have hired a contractor to install the second bathroom, and plan to move items from the red room into the theater once the production of the musical “Nuncrackers” finishes Dec. 16.

“We’ve explained to him how the organization works and how it doesn’t work,” Del Sole said. In response to the September letter,

“I said ‘we’re in the middle of a show and all of the company’s efforts are being devoted to the show. This is what our timetable is going to be -- we’re trying to get the bathroom done and brick up the wall (between the theater and red room) by the end of this year. But that’s not good enough because he wants you to do something yesterday.”

Del Sole said he understands Gulino is losing money on the red room, but he “find(s) it ridiculous that somehow the organization is the villain in this process” because Gulino didn’t give them enough notice.

Gulino and his potential tenant, Eva Gryczan, don’t buy that argument.

Gryczan said she approached Gulino in late July with plans to open a Polish imports store and deli at 61 W. Main St. She also offered to keep the store open on performance nights to allow theater patrons to use the restroom.

But Del Sole said the group rejected her offer for two reasons – the smell of the deli wafting into the theater and the potential loss of profits from candy and drink sales at intermission.

“Have you ever gone to a theater and smelled Polish deli coming through the doorway?” Del Sole asked. “Our candy and cookie sales would be wiped out or in direct competition with the tenant. We run the theater on a shoestring budget as it is.”

Gryczan, however, said she’s so anxious to open her store that she would gladly refrain from selling items during shows.

“I’ve been talking to the Polish community, promising we’ll be open soon,” said Gryczan, whose family runs a similar store in New Britain. “People keep waiting and asking. It’s kind of hard for me not to be ready yet. Are they thinking I’m not serious enough?”

And Gryczan said there wouldn’t be a strong smell because she wouldn’t be cooking at the store.

She’s willing to wait until January, she said, but after that would have to find a new space. Meanwhile, the items she purchased, such as refrigerators and other equipment, are in storage.

The case could progress in housing court within about three weeks, Del Sole said.

He believes the players’ 15-year lease with the city is still valid because it was never formally terminated when the property was sold, despite language in the city’s sale contract with Gulino that said the group was on a month-to-month lease.

Ceneviva and Gulino said their agreement with the city is simply to lease 57-59 W. Main St. to a not-for-profit theater group, and that other groups might be interested if the players are forced to leave.

They are also questioning in court if the players’ non-profit status is intact.

Del Sole said it is, and that Gulino’s refusal to sign a long-term agreement with the group is preventing it from qualifying for grant money to improve the theater.

“We could do some very nice cosmetic changes to the theater itself if we could get this lease signed,” Del Sole said.
Local politicians and Staci Roy of the Meriden Arts Council said they hope the two sides will come together to resolve their differences.

“They put on six performances per year,” she said. “That’s a lot of theater. I would hate to see our main community group leaving that space."

prince
11-23-2007, 10:56 AM
The Developer is moving too fast! Does Mr. Del Sole remember that the Red Room issue has been around since last year when the Record Journal reported that the theater needed it for the bathrooms? Is it not true that the theater space has and had 2 bathrooms? One is functioning and one being used as broom closet. Didn't the developer help Mr. Stephen in moving things out of 2 other spaces that the theater occupied.

Good faith questioned? 8 months of back and forth. It all started with an offer to the theater to lease the Red room at a greatly reduced rate that they denied. Should that not have been the clue that it was for rent. How about the direct conversations with Mr. Stephan with regaurds to the developer moving the Red room content for the theater at no charge back in August.

Paint the real picture! Del Sole knows that the theater will not be putting up any walls or install a second bathroom. The developer is giving the Theater FREE SPACE. The Theater is giving no Thanks. Most theater groups would love to have a rent free space.

Has anyone looked at the buildings lately? Do we want to stall any new Bussiness in our downtown? Isn't the developer doing exactly what he said he would do?

If the theater group would have spent any effort on moving out of the Red room none of this would have been.

How about the ridiculous claim that Mr. Del Sole made about the smells from the POLISH DELI Wafting into the theater and potential loss of profits from candy and drink sales. OK lets talk profit. How much do they make? The smells if any might be an improvment. I hope the Polish community isn't offended. Mr Del Sole should have welcomed Ms. Gryczan very kind offer! Is this an example of the theaters Idea of Good faith?:confused:

eds
11-23-2007, 11:14 AM
The developer's first priority is to the theatre group. Bottom line. I don't care what the letter of the contract says, there is an implied fiduciary duty to the theatre.

"As a condition of the sale, Gulino and the theater company were required to negotiate a long-term lease that would allow the players to keep their performance space at 57-59 W. Main St. rent free."

Those negotiations include being able to fully utilize the space, including facilities, and to have a say into who can rent the space without adversely affecting the theatre.

The developer went into this deal with full knowledge of the implied duty by contract. The developer is indirectly trying to force out the players. I find the developer at fault and in breech of his fiduciary duty to support the players. The developer is not loosing one cent because he purchased the building for a cut-rate price in the first place.

collie
11-23-2007, 11:18 AM
Typical of Meriden politicians to dump the locals who were there first. Reminds me of what Valencia Liquor went through. Gulino got the buildings for $50,000. when they're worth much more. Yes, he's done a fine job in rehabbing but I thought it was a funny scheme from the beginning, meaning the "artist lofts." The real arts group has been dumped, not ousted from the beginning because the public would object to an outright eviction from the get go. Guidelines for "artists" have never been shared with the public and should exist somewhere in writing. I predict crackheads calling themselves artists will be using the housing and the theater who actually broght people downtown will be evicted. Politicians who engineered this so-called "economic development" are now hiding behind the statement: "I hope they can work their diffenerences out." There's little they can do now, having given the buildings to Gulino for a "song." So much for the Arts, the shark developers have circled, saw an opportunity to get over and did so so easily, the city looks complicent. Opponents please provide the missing part of the puzzle for me, that being the guidelines the artists will have to fulfill in order to rent and tell me how many legistamate artists you think will be renting. As for Polish delis, I'll continue to support Filipek's and Czaiga's.

janerose
11-23-2007, 04:02 PM
With only a few productions downtown each year; why would the theatre (?) even feel they should be taking a permanent place downtown; a viable business that is active 52 weeks out the year would make much better sense to the resurgence of the area. The Castle Craig players would be better suited to use the Curtis Cultural Center for their random productions; there are plenty of bathrooms there.

The "playhouse" frontage does not reflect a lively establishment; it always looks closed and almost abandoned throughout the year; we need life downtown; not an ocasional show a few nights a year.

I have seriously considered moving into Mr. Gulino's artists apartments; they will be well built; with well screened tenants as are all of his buildings.

collie
11-23-2007, 07:04 PM
Well, Jane Rose I hope you do so and I hope you are an artist. I'm sure the Record Journal will be writing an article about the "artists" who move in. Bet there's at least one rap artist starting a recording studio in the mix. And you must be one loaded artist if you can afford to rent the Curtis Cultural Center.

Fit 2 Print
11-26-2007, 01:01 PM
Sounds like a bunch of squabbling children to me . . .