PDA

View Full Version : Oct. 27, 2007: Platt students stage walkout



Record-Journal
10-26-2007, 11:16 PM
MERIDEN -- Discontented with the school administration, about 200 students walked out of Platt High School Friday morning.

As Meriden police officers watched, the students made their way to the sidewalks on Coe Avenue and faced their school building and a few toilet-papered trees. Some waved signs; others shouted as cars passing by honked their horns.
They had no fear.

“If you stand up for what you believe in, you need to take the repercussions for it,” said Shamara Shuff, 16.

Friday’s demonstration was over Halloween costumes. Platt’s administrative team is enforcing the district-wide dress code this year, and they said students could not come to school in costume next Wednesday.

Students are upset because at cross-town rival Maloney High School costumes will be allowed on Halloween.

“We want to wear hats,” Bethany Gagnon, 17, said. “We want to wear face paint. It’s just for one day.”

In the end, their protest succeeded as school officials told them costumes will be allowed that do not violate the dress code.

But as passionate as the students were about Halloween, they said their walkout was about more than just the holiday.

“It’s for everything we can’t do anymore,” Shuff said.
Students do not like the Board of Education’s dress code, for one thing, but Platt no longer has a homecoming dance. Students say they are worried that more traditional events and privileges will be taken away.

“I guarantee in one year they are going to make us wear uniforms,” 16-year-old Joseph Knowles said. “They are taking away my First Amendment rights here.”

Ben Haesche, 17, said there was no leader to the group of students that walked out so he took charge, motivating the crowd and telling them to stay out of the street.

Haesche said more students had been planning to participate in the walkout, but teachers stood at the front doors and warned students they would be suspended for three days if they left.

The warnings were enough to get several students to turn around, Haesche said.

But like Haesche, Dave Gavrish, 18, was not dissuaded.
“I really don’t care,” he said. “There’s enough people out here. I really don’t think they are going to do anything.”
Gavrish was right.

After spending 40 minutes outside, Principal Timothy Gaffney approached the students. He told them that the ones who went inside to the auditorium to talk with the principal would not be suspended, and most of the students followed him back inside.

Jeffrey A. Villar, the associate superintendent for instruction, attended the meeting and said school administrators had a productive dialogue with students.

Most students acted maturely during the discussion, Villar said, but about 20 students were more interested in disrupting school. Those students will get the promised suspension, he said. Platt administrators will determine the length of the suspensions.

“The student body made some concerns known,” Villar said, adding that both Halloween and homecoming were discussed.
Students will be allowed to come to school in costume next week if the attire does not violate the dress code, and Gaffney has agreed to work with students to try to revive the homecoming dance tradition.

“We might get everything we wanted,” said Candace Travali, 16.

Gaffney said he was clarifying his position on costumes Friday, but students say he reversed it. Platt’s Web site read Thursday: “To maintain educational decorum, students will NOT be allowed to wear Halloween costumes.”

Friday, the Web site was updated to say: “Students may wear costumes that conform to the Board of Education policy.”

“They went back on their word,” said Andreas Pappas, 17.
Administrators also used Friday’s meeting as a time to teach students that protests may not be the best way to handle a situation, Villar said.

“Our door is always open to talk to kids,” Gaffney said.
Travali said she and her peers may not have needed to walk out in protest, but she said extreme action was necessary.

“That was the only way they were going to listen,” Travali said.

Eastside Bill
10-27-2007, 12:59 PM
If you go to the bank on Halloween, the staff is all dressed up in costumes. Why the ban in the first place if the same school system is allowing costumes across town. Platt's administration did not handle this well at all.

MurphyD
10-27-2007, 02:50 PM
Come on. Of the things students ought to stage massive protests over, Halloween costumes seems to me to be the silliest. How about: The administration is not fulfilling its obligation to us as learners. The administration is failing to provide students with adequate knowhow about mass demonstrations, thus leaving students to exercise their right to assembly over matters of such microscopic consequence. To quote the sitting president, "Is our children learning?"

I had read the headline for this story, and it gave me hope, that finally, students were arguing in defense of their own needs. Soon, however, it became laughable that the newspaper had given such a serious tone to the protest, when the real issue was the costume ban...Kudos to the students for standing up, but COME ON!!!!!! People!!!! Get your heads right and start acting on the points that matter... Maybe they can create a new, statewide standardized test for this sort of thing....chuckle, chuckle.


Peace.

BillCarson436
10-27-2007, 07:45 PM
Hello....

Zero tolerance.

Their KIDS...

It's SCHOOL.....

So let them boycott... and make sure that tests are scheduled for that
day. No Make up sessions.

This is STUPID.

And please... no " Rules are made to be broken "

What will they boycott next...lol

jma
10-28-2007, 05:13 PM
Nice going Platt administration!! A group of students decide to use up police resources, school resources, & create chaos......all for "the right" to wear a damn costume?? And you gave in and let them win. Nice lession to learn. Throw a temper tantrum, and eventually you'll get what you want. I'm sure those skills will get them far in life.

Fit 2 Print
10-29-2007, 12:53 PM
Sometimes it takes a display of unity to gain the ear of decision-makers. Yes, the rules should be followed, provided they're fair and students UNDERSTAND why the rules exist.
At least these students were organized and, overall, controlled.

eds
10-29-2007, 02:05 PM
I applaud these children. For having the courage to stand up for what they believe in. These children are engaged. That will translate well into their adult life when they turn out en-mass to vote for what concerns them most. It's the answer to apathetic young adults who do not voice their opinions.

To say that their concern is trivial, misses the point. To adults it would seem trivial, but in the minds of these children it's something they believed in, fought peacefully for, and affected real change.

Sure there are more important things to protest over. But importance is subjective to the person. What is important is that the administration and the student body formed a productive negotiation and each side was able to address the needs of the other. It was a win-win situation.

What I think could have been done better, was to approach the administration first as a group to open a dialog to discuss that matter. Then, when that did not get results, stage the protest.

Can you imagine if the people of this town were as passionate as these children? There would be lots more candidates to pick from during local elections, the finance and other town meetings would be packed to the rafters, and the op-ed page of the record-journal would be unable to print all the letters.

Which reminds me. A while back students were in danger of losing AP courses. I can't recall the town. However, students kept writing letters and more letters to the point the R-J cut off all letters to that subject. Most of the letters were well written, passionate pieces. I feel the stereotypical apathetic student is becoming a thing of the past.

Watch out. One of these students may be your next councilor.

bnm
10-31-2007, 04:43 PM
My two cents-
I am not a fan of the walkout, since a few high schoolers will abuse the priviledge and ruin it for the others. However, it is sad that the elementary schools (some or all) outlawed costumes. At the elementary level I believe this is an essential day to create fond thoughts of school, generate a social behavior, and allows children to express themselves. Self esteem and self efficacy are essentials to children and dress up is one way to create this. It is a shame our elementary school children are attending a day prison to learn rather than an educational community which is full of laughter and knowledge.

Fit 2 Print
10-31-2007, 05:45 PM
BMN's commentary really "hit the nail on the head"! Self-expression, in this example, is a healthy thing for robust young minds. What's the harm?

eds
11-01-2007, 07:21 AM
Isn't halloween a holiday where kids dress up, primarily? I would have guessed that of course at the elementary level costumes were allowed. They were required when I was in kindergarten in the early 70s. Every kid had to dress up and participate.

Is there some explanation why at the elementary level costuming is banned but not at the high school level? Seems backwards to me...

bnm
11-01-2007, 10:50 AM
I too remember dressing up for Halloween, doing a parade, and a small class party. I guess we must be messed for doing so. There must be some reason that dressing up for Halloween is under such scrutiny, maybe it is because some schools are under an audit. Even so on a day like Halloween or another holiday there is such a buzz and excitment that a true education work day is difficult to accomplish. So give the kids a little fun.. Any one see Its the great pumpkin, Charlie Brown?

eds
11-01-2007, 10:54 AM
I did! Been watching it for 30+ years...

Fit 2 Print
11-01-2007, 01:42 PM
It's part of the American spirit -- right here, in Meriden.